Tuesday, February 1, 2011

The ten day week

The item on the radio: Corporate profits are at an all-time high, worker productivity is at an all-time high, unemployment is still horribly, miserably high. Why am I not surprised? Companies have discovered that they can get along without the dead wood. There is plenty of dead wood in the so-called private sector, as well as the public sector.

Fortunately, there is a solution. And, just as fortunately, the solution will drive everyone totally nuts. The solution is the ten day week. I used to bring up the ten day week as dinner party chat, and was generally ignored. No more.

Turns out my whole new structure to life was tried before, during the French Revolution, as part of the attempt to rationalize everyday life. I have been legitimized. Or delegitimized, depending whether you are a French aristocrat or not.

Before the revolution in France, necessities were priced in a delightful way. Bread was sold by the loaf; if the price of wheat went up, the loaf was a little smaller. If milk was scarce, a little water was added to the bottle. And so on. But the peasants, in particular, always paid the same amount for the loaf of bread or the bottle of milk, and were a bit insulated from the varying prices of staples. Folks who cheated the peasants were driven out of town.

But the revolutionaries demanded that, by golly, the system should be rational, and this foolishness must end, and the peasants must pay for a measured amount of bread or milk or anything. The peasants would have none of it; together with a bunch of similar bad moves by the revolutionaries, the emphasis on rationality in daily events turned the peasant class against the revolution.

The ten day week was another of those doomed ideas. Revolutionaries divided the year into twelve 30 day months -- which were renamed -- and each month had 3 ten day weeks*. At the end of the year, there was a five day holiday period. Each day had ten hours, each hour had 100 minutes, and so on. They were obsessed with the decimal business.** Didn't matter; the bible said seven days. The revolution was doomed.

That was then. Fortunately, we are no longer in the grips of religious fundamentalism. Snarky. The new ten day week will be divided into one five day unit called the First, and another five day unit called the Second. Half the population will work during each unit. A job will have two...hmm...occupants. Everyone will have a job for five days of ten, everyone will have leisure for five days of ten; the economy will blossom, and lions and lambs will do whatever together. Note that I have, with my usual modesty, not named the half-weeks after myself.

There will be some problems. What about families in which two parents, say, are working? Well, if they both work the First, or both work the Second, the family will have the whole other 5 days together, and will need day care for only five of ten days, rather than five of seven. If the adults work different periods, all day care problems are nicely solved. Vacation scheduling will be easy. Couples can take the same half-week, or the opposite half-week, depending on how they are getting along. Work scheduling will be difficult and will provide jobs for all the extra middle managers.

Strange loyalties will develop, and perhaps the Super Bowl will be played between the winners of the First and Second divisions, at some time during 5 DAY, those magical five extra days.

The big, big deal: there will be no unemployment!!! None at all!!! An immediate demand for workers, and then, of course, demand for goods and services. The ten day week saves civilization!!! And all my idea!!! Time to pick up my Nobel. I hope I know how to act at the dinner.

Whatever solution exists, there is no question about the problem. Current financial blahs are demand based, not supply based. There is plenty of capital around looking for places to settle, but not enough demand to buy stuff. If there was ever a time to take the wealth from the wealthy, this is it; the usual rationalization, that wealthy folks provide capital, is even more goofy now. We don't need more capital!!!! We have capital up our ying-yangs, or whatever the plural of ying-yang is. We need people buying stuff!!!

The French revolution and the ten day week aside, what are we to do with all the extra folks for whom there are no jobs, and never will be? Our young men, for instance, can't all go into the killing vocations. We need manufacturing jobs for them; we need the factory floor. Office work won't do; "Hell's Angels, Wayland Branch" colors may go fine in the factory, but not at Chase bank.

The ten-day week is my best idea -- actually, my only idea. I don't think anyone else has any ideas to compete. During the last boom, the killing industries provided jobs, and the housing industry provided jobs. One of them (guess which!!) is out of business, and it looks now like the killing industries are going to be able to get along with the labor they already have. This is where our enslavement to the supply/demand nonsense really gets annoying.

There are more of us than there are jobs, and we have no clue about how to cope. Until we pull manufacturing back from wherever it has gone, we will suffer the disastrous consequences of trading jobs for wealth. Bad idea when we started, worse idea now. We need manufacturing. We need factories.

Once again, we had what we needed, and we gave it all away.

That total isolation thing? Starting to look better, isn't it?

*Of course, Thermidor appears in Lobster Thermidor, a dish rumored to have been prepared for Napoleon I during Thermidor. In the Julian calendar that was about July 13 to August 12; the name is derived from the root therm, meaning heat. Duh. The common rule-of-thumb, no shellfish in months without an "r" in the name, applies only to oysters. Turns out the best time to eat lobsters is in months ending in "r", except December. No idea how this maps onto the revolution month names. Blah, blah. I love this stuff.

**The French revolutionaries, we should note, did not divide their ten-day weeks into two five-day units, so I can still revel in my creativity.

4 comments:

  1. Not so funny, buster. Specially the unemployment figures. If you were unemployed, you wouldn't be so snarky about being out of work.

    Just shut up. Go back to writing about steaming corpses, OK?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why not just do a 6 day week and swap the work shift every 3 days?
    With the isolationism you're sounding like Pat Buchanan. Someone you are farthest away from !

    The jobs outlook is tragic. The funny thing is the government wants to extend the retirement age in order to "solve" the insolvency of yet another socialist program that could never work for long. Forcing people to work longer past 65. It's bad enough trying to find a job at 25 let alone 65 ! This is bad - real bad....I think i'll check out the post about the steaming corpses, I think I missed that one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, Duggy!!

    Yeah, the steaming corpse posts are among my favorites. Try
    http://performativeutterances.blogspot.com/2010/10/religious-war-4.html

    I'm a little confused about your Social Security comments.

    SS is, of course, the most successful social program in US history. It outshines the mortgage deduction, which was a major factor in post-war development, and a very successful bit of social engineering. And, of course, socialist; in pure capitalism, that sort of gov't intervention only defies the market.

    SS has been significant in the lives of elders for maybe 70 years. It is solvent through 2030 or so. Not bad. Even if it stopped today, a major good. How else to deal with the huge number of poor elders? I am open to suggestion; I belong to that group now, and am enormously grateful that I have some income to depend on.

    My only cavil is that SS is a regressive program, and does not redistribute any wealth.

    In my discussions with folks who have been more able that I at building wealth, I note that they consider themselves very capable types, whose skills would enable them to generate wealth anywhere. I agree.

    Our best strategy is to confiscate their wealth and have them build more. Why throw away the abilities and energy of our most capable? The stupidity of allowing them to live inert and slug-like stuns me.

    We can either be ruthlessly dedicated to producing more wealth, or we can be morally pure. Not both. Ah, the famous Naturalistic Fallacy again. I'll go with the more wealth; we need to do all we can, capitalist, socialist, communist, reactionary, whatever will increase production of what we need.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your divided 10-day week reminds me of Bellamy's Looking Backward, which I read around age 13 and mean to go back to. As I recall, his scheme was something like: learning a skill until age 20, working between 20 and 40, and happy retirement until death. Some of the justification was to share jobs. BTW, the 40-hour week has been gospel for about 60 years now, another thing to change.

    As for Social Security: it's solvent until 2037. Fixes, assuming we keep the current retirement age (and it is no longer 65--it's up to about 68 for younger workers now), are: a) full employment (so that all contribute to the system); b) taxes on all income, not just employment income as the payroll tax is currently constructed; c) raise the income ceiling (now at $106K/year). If you're really interested, take a look at the info provided by one of the organizations with which I volunteer: National Jobs for All Coaltion (njfac.org).

    Sad to say, the current direction of this country is in the exact opposite direction--we're moving to continuous, massive unemployment and inequality.
    Margy

    ReplyDelete